Dar al-Hayat
Lebanon
Let Us Envy the
Americans and the Chechens
By Zuheir
Kseibati
January 03, 2008
Lebanon
- Dar al-Hayat - Original Article - (English)
In the
unhappy language of statistics, and without pretending that fortune tellers are
authoritative or legitimate, we cite some figures from the end of 2007, which
elucidate the common denominator in the region:
• In Iraq, 568 people were killed in the
last months of 2007.
• In the
Somali capital of Mogadishu, 6,500 civilians were killed last
year, with more than 8,500 wounded. In the same vein, some 1.5 million people
were displaced from the capital that is lost in its myriad of weapons.
• In the
last clashes between "Fatah" and "Hamas" in Gaza on New Year's Eve, seven
Palestinians were killed, while Israel came through 2007 with only one
suicide attack …And on the first day of the new year,
30 Iraqis were killed by a suicide bomber who attacked people offering
condolences.
Killing
prevails across the region and respects no sanctity - to the extent that the
Palestinians, saddled with tragedy, no longer ask after the identity of those
who kill women and children and bring down homes upon their heads…Are they
killed by Palestinian bullets, the rockets of factions, or the fire of the
Israelis?
Killing
has become an arm of diplomacy and of policy in the region, from Iraq to Somalia and Palestine. The national unity slogans, as
they multiply, become even more distant from reality and dreams, and are they
are the same from Baghdad to Mogadishu, Gaza and Ramallah,
and even to Beirut, lost where need meets fact.
Isn't the
attempt to disseminate models of "unshielded" states, whose
legitimacies, institutions and constitutions have been breached, nightmarish
and fearful enough? In such states, officials lash out and exchange curses with
a view to snatching concessions from the "patriotic" rival-enemy - the local
"enemy" accused of working for the devil, of manipulating destinies
and nations.
Killing
is used to change maps. Tragically for the Arabs, they realize what is in store
for them in the darkness of night when a brother becomes Public Enemy Number
One, an agent of George Bush or his favorite rival, Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad … or even Hugo Chavez, until Fidel Castro
finally recuperates from his health problems.
Arabs can
envy the Iranians, who were promised elections this year, and the most powerful
weapons, spiritually cursed … Or they can envy the Americans who are counting
the remaining days before George Bush leaves the White House. Or even the
Chechens, who have come to understand the limits of the game of nations and the
killing fields.
The
region is awaiting, first of all, an imminent visit by the US president, whose greatest
"achievement" has become merely to envisage a viable Palestinian
state, while always offering Israel everything that will liquidate
that dream of a state and encourage the Palestinians to destroy what is left of
their cause.
Bush will
not deceive anyone. More accurately, he is no longer able to tout promises and
distribute medals. For he has left behind bloody chapters in Iraq's history, bloody chapters
neither the Republicans nor the Democrats will be able to erase from the memory
of America and the world. But how innocent
are the Iraqis?
The
region is also awaiting an Arab Summit due to take place in Damascus. This summit must be assumed to
be an occasion for solidarity and an end to the collapse and breaches, as a
prerequisite to salvation. More importantly, the summit, if it takes place,
should provide an opportunity to explore the reasons behind the spread of such
"unshielded" states that expand at the pace of a volcanic explosion.
The summit, dubbed an "Arab" meeting, reminds one of the slogan of the Riyadh Summit, the function of the Arab League
and the common interests that have always deterred the winds blowing from
outside the region.
Perhaps
the term "self-criticism" has become old-fashioned. At the very
least, wouldn't it be a good idea to contemplate the likely consequences of
sticking to the policy of rivalries, of brandishing competing slogans and
voicing our pride in the Arab-Arab tug of war, while neighboring powers besiege
the region - at times in the name of countering the dreams of Bush, and at
other times, under the pretext of preserving national "unities" or
teaching us the language of killing in Palestine, as Israel does, so that every
Arab becomes a terrorist?
Ever
since the inception of the Arab Summit, the initial core cause has been Palestine. With it, the Arabs discovered
freedom. Today, the Palestinians in Ramallah protest
against what they consider as Hamas' attempt to
strangle the word and freedom of opinion in Gaza.
Where
does the true problem lie? Does it lie in the "loss of word," the
internecine bloodshed, the expansion of unshielded states, or the endeavors to
veil the real perpetrator?