JoongAng Ilbo, South Korea
Look Both Ways
Korea must enhance both its alliance
with the U.S. and its cooperation with China in order to increase its
strategic value.
By Kan Jun-young
February 01, 2008
South Korea
- JoongAng Ilbo - Original Article (English)
For the
past several years, self-reliance has been a central concern of Korea’s relations with the United States, while the U.S. and China have been at the center of our
diplomacy. Particularly during North Korea’s nuclear threats, the South has
found itself sandwiched between the whims of the United States and China. The decision to take a
self-reliant approach when dealing with the United States created some blank space which
the Koreas could not control on their own, and China naturally moved in to occupy that
space.
Which
country is more important to Korea ― the U.S. or China ― has been a source of exhaustive
debate. This dichotomy stems from the assumption that the alliance between Korea and Japan will not be shaken, and from the
exaggerated and even mistaken perspective that the United States and China occasionally clash even though
they cooperate, while Japan and China only compete. However, recent
developments tell another story.
First,
the United States, which pursues strategic
flexibility, has abandoned its hard-line stance toward North Korea, going so far as to present the
reclusive country with incentives to persuade it to give up its nuclear
weapons.
In fact,
the United States is actively engaging the entire Korean Peninsula, also signing a free trade
agreement with Seoul.
Since the
launch of the Yasuo Fukuda administration, Japan has become increasingly
diplomatically active in the Asian region. For example Japan is trying to establish a new,
closer relationship with China.
Meanwhile,
China has made achievements on the global stage with its
pragmatic brand of diplomacy, emphasizing noninterference with a nation’s
internal politics, while the United States has been preoccupied with the war
on terrorism.
President-elect
Lee Myung-bak is searching for ways to enhance the
Korea-U.S. alliance and to improve bilateral, mutually beneficial relations
with the four strong neighboring countries.
It is
natural for the new administration to try to patch up and enhance relations
with the United States. It will be impossible to go back
to the old type of alliance in which one side was always giving and the other
always taking. But the emphasis on the alliance between Korea and the United States is very meaningful for two
reasons.
First,
although the U.S. has revealed many flaws and made
mistakes when implementing its foreign policies, it is capable of serving as a
mediator between China and Japan, as well as on the Korean Peninsula.
Second,
even while Seoul is confronting North Korea, its economy is heavily
internationally engaged. In this sense, Korea has far fewer conflicting
interests with the United States than some other countries.
The
question is China. As Korea-U.S. relations have
become less firm than they once were, China, as the host country of the
six-party talks aimed at resolving the North Korean nuclear issue, has
increased its influence over issues on the Korean Peninsula.
But the United States and North Korea are trying to have direct talks
and the Lee Myung-bak administration is talking about
enhancing Korea-U.S. relations. These moves will certainly damage the
diplomatic status that China has so far enjoyed.
If Seoul’s new administration has a North Korea policy at odds with the stability
of the North Korean regime that China has promoted as a means of
maintaining regional security, China will inevitably lose its power to
influence North Korea to some extent.
China is thus closely watching how much
effort Korea will put into enhancing the
alliance between Korea, the United States and Japan, and how South Korea will respond to the Proliferation
Security Initiative and the establishment of a missile defense system.
Judging
by the current situation, Korea should maintain the best possible
relationship with the United States in order to receive
acknowledgment of its strategic value from China.
At the
same time, Korea also should keep things close
with China to be recognized by the United States for the same reason. Korea must not build alliances based on
emotional reasons or by reflex.
Diplomacy
is action aimed at maximizing the interests of one’s country on the global
stage. Korea’s ultimate goal is diplomacy. In
bilateral relations, two countries might have the same primary goal, but they
don’t necessarily have the same final aim.
While
making our foreign relations policies, we need to use comprehensive, strategic
judgment in all our bilateral and multilateral relations.
The new
Korean administration must define its logic and prepare plans to secure
dialogue channels with both the United States and China.
*The
writer is a professor at the Graduate School of International and Area Studies,
Hankuk University of Foreign Studies.